The list: Melbourne suburbs' liveability ranking revealed
I found this news in the Age, Its an old article but I think it could be interesting for some people.
You can read it from here or from the Age (The Age)
- 1. Overall rank
- + Suburb has risen in rank since 2005 (number indicates how many places)
- - Suburb has dropped in rank since 2005 (number indicates how many places)\
- = No change since last survey
- $$$$$ Median house price above $1.2 million
- $$$$ Median house price $800k-$1.2 million
- $$$ Median house price $600k-$800k
- $$ Median house price $400k-$600k
- $$$$$ Median house price below $400k
1. South Yarra = $$$$$
Advertisement
Despite six years passing and our methodology somewhat changing since our last survey,
South Yarra
retains top spot, achieving a perfect score on nine out of 14
indicators, including provision of cafes/restaurants, shopping, schools
and culture. Close to the city and coast, it also excels in areas where
inner suburbs traditionally struggle — namely, it has plenty of open
space and trees, aided by Fawkner Park and the Botanic Gardens. It is
also hilly, has great public transport, and falls down only on crime
rates and clogged main roads. Hard to budge.
2. East Melbourne = $$$$$
Home to Yarra Park, Treasury Gardens, the MCG and Parliament House,
East Melbourne
holds its ground in the 2011 survey with top marks in eight categories,
also improving its score for shopping after changes to the “Eastbourne”
retail strip on Wellington Parade. Not exactly in the belly of the
bustle, what it lacks in urgency it makes up in proximity to dynamism —
cross a boundary and you enter the CBD (26), Carlton (12), Fitzroy (70),
Collingwood (31), Abbotsford (53) or Richmond (51).
3. Armadale +2 $$$$$
Hemmed in on the north, south, east and west by (respectively) Malvern, Dandenong, Glenferrie and Orrong roads,
Armadale
is perhaps bigger than you think. Toorak Park and Toorak Railway
Station, for instance, are both inside its western edge. Train, tram and
bus are never far away, shopping is plentiful, and crime rates and
congestion on its main roads are not as big a problem as in most other
suburbs close to the CBD — the only thing preventing Armadale from
a higher ranking is its almost total lack of open spaces.
4. Hawthorn East -1 $$$$$
Unlike those neighbourhoods ranked above it,
Hawthorn East
can boast only two perfect scores across all indicators — one of those
courtesy of its low crime rate. A thin, vertical strip of land between
Hawthorn (11) and Camberwell (84), it is rich in historic mansions and
stately homes, but the survey doesn’t take architectural aesthetics into
account — Hawthorn East simply performs well by every measure, even
more so than notable neighbours Kooyong (23), Kew (35) and Canterbury
(48).
5. Toorak +1 $$$$$
High congestion, virtually no bus services and basically no
open space — these are the things that drag Toorak down to fifth place
in our rankings. One of Australia’s most expensive suburbs, with a
median house price of $2.274 million, its curving northern boundary is
formed by the steep slopes along the Yarra, where Melbourne’s largest
homes were initially perched so that wealthy industrialists might keep
an eye on their factories in flat “struggletown” suburbs to the north
such as Burnley (16) and Richmond (51).
6. Clifton Hill -2 $$$
With a median house price of $766,000 and a ranking solidly in the top 10,
Clifton Hill —
a leafy oasis of Victorian homes and Yarra parkland amid the traffic of
Hoddle Street and the Eastern Freeway — is arguably the best-value
suburb in Melbourne: you’ll have to drop down to 20th place (Hampton
East) to find somewhere cheaper that’s even close in terms of
liveability. So why is it so much higher than its immediate (and
pricier) neighbour Fitzroy North (28)? It has marginally better access
to the train, it’s a bit hillier, and it has a bit more open space.
What’s not to like? Crime levels aren’t great.
7. Parkville +12 $$$$$
A new arrival in the top 10,
Parkville,
another green oasis in the inner north, scores highly on open space
(take a bow, Royal Park), and improved slightly on the last survey with
schools and shopping to jump 12 places. What cost it ranking points?
Crime, poor access to bus routes and, when you venture onto the main
roads, traffic flow is lousy.
8. Ormond +10 $$$$
If you live in
Ormond and always wished you
could have afforded neighbouring Brighton East (50) or even Brighton
(27) proper, here’s solace: your suburb is nicer than both. And cheaper.
And, depending on your address, gets you into one of the best schools
in Melbourne for free: savvy families know that parts of Ormond (below
North Road) fall within the zone for McKinnon Secondary College. Crime
is relatively low, there’s a train line and you’re well served by
several good Indian restaurants. The only major negatives, at least in
terms of how this study works, are small amounts of open space and
a flat landscape.
9. Fairfield +1 $$$$
Bordering Clifton Hill (6), it’s not surprising that
Fairfield
scores highly too: again, access to Yarra Bend parklands means it fares
well on open space, with high marks, too, for shopping and cafes.
Only less-than-stellar proximity to schools and congested main roads
costs it ranking points.
10. Hampton +36 $$$$$
So why did
Hampton fare better than
neighbouring, and ritzier, Brighton (languishing in 27th spot)? Less
congested main roads (none to speak of, really, except Beach Road),
slightly more (and hillier) open space, better bus routes and slightly
better crime levels. Brighton has better shopping though.
11. Hawthorn -3 $$$$$
12. Carlton +5 $$$$
13. Carlton North = $$$$
14. Aberfeldie +28 $$$$
15. Mont Albert North +1 $$$$
The big performer in the east,
Mont Albert North
is strong on all indicators. Crossing the Eastern Freeway to the north,
however, direct neighbour Doncaster (158) finds itself 143 places
further down — the main differences being lack of proximity to schools,
congested main roads and crime rates.
16. Burnley +20 $$$$
17. Ripponlea +73 $$$$
When proximity to train, tram and bus are combined,
Ripponlea is
the best suburb in the city for public transport. What about Melbourne
(26), you ask? The CBD scores well, too, but is let down by parkland
stretching to Cremorne (74), where there are less bus stops.
18. Windsor -9 $$$$
19. St Kilda East +51 $$$$
20. Hampton East +56 $$$
21. Caulfield South +10 $$$$
22. Balaclava +3 $$$$
23. Kooyong +4 $$$$$
24. Elsternwick = $$$$$
25. Parkdale +3 $$$
26. Melbourne +7 $$$
The
Melbourne CBD scores highest for
restaurants and cafes. It is also the worst suburb for crime (per
capita), but this is because it has so many visitors and so few
residents. For instance, many of the violent crimes committed here are
“outsider on outsider” offences.
27. Brighton -12 $$$$$
28. Fitzroy North -7 $$$$
29. Albert Park -3 $$$$$
30. Elwood +44 $$$$$
31. Collingwood -9 $$$
32. Ivanhoe -25 $$$$
Ranked seven in the 2005 study,
Ivanhoe has
dropped 25 spots since then and is a lesson in how a few points can make
a big difference. Ivanhoe suffered marginal losses in a few indicators,
but the drop is largely attributed to the relative rise of other
suburbs.
33. Sandringham -21 $$$$$
34. Prahran -4 $$$$
35. Kew +10 $$$$$
36. Northcote +20 $$$$
37. Footscray +7 $$
The most affordable suburb in the top 50 (by a mile),
Footscray
rates higher than many traditionally more highly regarded suburbs
including blue‑blooded Canterbury (48), super-expensive Middle Park (61)
and the middle-class heartland Malvern East (62).
38. Mont Albert = $$$$
39. St Kilda +1 $$$$
40. Williamstown -12 $$$$
41. Brunswick West = $$$
42. Newport +12 $$$
Closing the gap on its desirable neighbour Williamstown (40),
Newport is
close to the coast and city, scores high on culture and cafes and
restaurants, has low congestion on main roads, good proximity to trains
and open spaces.
43. Gardenvale +26 *
Melbourne’s smallest suburb, at just under a third of a hectare,
Gardenvale
- a tiny wedge near Caulfield South (21) and Elsternwick (24) - flies
under the radar but is close to the coast and city and has great public
transport and roads, overcoming its lack of open space and hills.
44. Flemington +29 $$$
45. Essendon +2 $$$$
46. Kew East -35 $$$$
47. South Melbourne -11 $$$$
48. Canterbury -34 $$$$$
49. Seddon +62 $$$
Twenty years ago, who would have thought that
Seddon
would be ranked just one spot below Canterbury (48)? The inner-western
suburb has risen 62 places since 2005, scoring better in cafes and
restaurants thanks to the evolving Victoria Street area, among other
factors.
50. Brighton East +3 $$$$
51. Richmond -17 $$$$
With Swan Street, Bridge Road, Victoria Street, Church Street and Victoria Gardens,
Richmond is
the top suburb for shopping facilities. Its popular cafe and restaurant
strips and train and tram services also score highly (although it loses
points for traffic congestion).
52. Travancore +40 $$$
53. Abbotsford -18 $$$
54. Black Rock -34 $$$$$
55. Footscray West +34 $$
56. North Melbourne -8 $$$
57. Caulfield +6 $$$$
The established south-east suburb of
Caulfield
is actually the worst suburb in the city for open space, with
relatively few parks, the bigger Caulfield Park falling within Caulfield
North (63) and Princes Park in Caulfield South (21).
58. Yarraville +30 $$$
Up-and-coming
Yarraville is one suburb
closer to the city than Brooklyn (269), yet sits 211 places above it on
the list, the disparity pinned down to differences in culture, cafes,
schools and open space.
59. Glen Iris +1 $$$$$
60. Montmorency +7 $$
61. Middle Park -2 $$$$$
62. Malvern East -13 $$$$
63. Caulfield North +2 $$$$$
64. Box Hill -3 $$$$
65. Malvern -26 $$$$$
66. Surrey Hills -34 $$$$
67. Alphington -16 $$$$
68. Ashburton -25 $$$$
69. Southbank +12 $$$
As might be expected,
Southbank’s proximity
to the Arts Centre and the National Gallery of Victoria in St Kilda Road
sees it ranked as the top suburb in Melbourne by size of cultural
sector.
70. Fitzroy -15 $$$$
71. McKinnon +41 $$$$
72. St Kilda West +34 $$$$$
Any rank inside the top 75 is upper echelon but
St Kilda West,
with a median housing price of $2.273 million, might expect a higher
ranking. Its downsides are busy main roads, flatness and crime.
73. Belgrave -1 $
Also inside the top 75, with a median house price of $370k,
Belgrave
is the success story of the survey, shattering the trend of outer areas
ranking low. If proximity to city and coast are left out, this gem
shoots to number two.
74. Cremorne +36 $$$
75. Burwood -52 $$$
One of a wide band of middle-eastern suburbs that have
dropped in rank marginally since 2005 — not unlike Blackburn (89) and
Bulleen (140) —
Burwood fell 52 places in 2011, despite remaining stable in liveability. Its drop is relative to the rise of other suburbs.
76. Glen Huntly -26 $$$$
77. Caulfield East +44 $$$$
78. Brunswick East -10 $$$
79. Murrumbeena = $$$$
80. Ascot Vale +3 $$$
81. Beaumaris -4 $$$$
82. Moonee Ponds +3 $$$$
Outscored by neighbouring Aberfeldie (14),
Moonee Ponds has
great public transport and is close to the city, schools, shopping and
cafes, but its roads are congested, its crime rates are high and it has
limited open space.
83. Thornbury +25 $$$
84. Camberwell +7 $$$$$
85. Templestowe Lower -28 $$$
86. Carnegie -11 $$$$
87. Ashwood -7 $$$
88. Kensington -24 $$$
89. Blackburn -31 $$$$
90. Brunswick -6 $$$
91. Kingsville +27 $$$
92. Princes Hill +34 $$$$
Tiny
Princes Hill is the best suburb
in Melbourne for proximity to schools, meaning residents on average have
less distance to travel to reach a kindergarten, primary, secondary
or special needs school — public or private — than anywhere else.
93. Ivanhoe East -22 $$$$$
94. Heidelberg -42 $$$
95. Braybrook -17 $$
This maligned inner-western suburb has limited open space and
tree cover, plus high crime, but these are offset by low congestion,
great proximity to schools, shopping facilities, cafes and restaurants.
Braybrook is also (relatively) close to the city and the beach.
96. South Kingsville +46 *
This little suburb you might not have heard of sneaks into the top 100.
South Kingsville
sits just underneath Spotswood (157), scores high for cafes,
restaurants and culture, is near both the bay and the bridge
and is relatively low in crime.
97. Tecoma +6 $
98. Hughesdale -16 $$$
99. Essendon West +2 $$$
100. Highett -34 $$$
101. Sassafras -4 $$
102. Balwyn +5 $$$$$
103. Oakleigh -4 $$$
104. Bentleigh +52 $$$$
Another of the biggest movers, the rise of
Bentleigh is probably more a reflection of its relatively low result last time than any major change in the suburb since then.
105. Upwey -19 $$
106. Eltham North +53 $$$
107. Balwyn North -9 $$$$
108. Ringwood East +9 $$
109. Essendon North -9 $$$$
110. Oak Park -1 $$$
111. Box Hill North -6 $$$
112. Coburg +63 $$$
One of the big improvers since 2005,
Coburg
rose 63 places (from 175), attributable to a notable increase in score
on the size of the cultural sector, following a general inner-northern
trend towards renewal and gentrification.
113. Heathmont -18 $$
114. Pascoe Vale South +65 $$$
Cross Moreland Road from Brunswick West (41) and you enter
Pascoe Vale South.
A big improver since 2005, the suburb rises 65 places, due to nothing
dramatic but a series of small gains in half
a dozen liveability indicators including shopping services.
115. Ferny Creek +13 *
Topographical mapping reveals that
Ferny Creek,
perched on the edge of Mount Dandenong, is officially Melbourne’s
hilliest suburb. It can also boast, according to per capita measures,
the lowest crime rate in Melbourne.
116. Seaholme -2 $$$
117. Macleod -1 $$$
118. Selby -37 $$$
119. Maribyrnong +27 $$$$
120. Kallista -7 $$
121. Mount Waverley -34 $$$
An interesting example of the difference a boundary line can make, stable
Mount Waverley is 151 spots above Clayton (272), but the only sizeable difference between the two is Mount Waverley’s good rating on crime.
122. Chadstone -60 $$$
123. Huntingdale +6 $$$
124. Kingsbury -28 $$
125. Briar Hill +67 $$
Adjoining Greensborough (162) and Montmorency (60),
Briar Hill
has risen 67 places in the rankings since 2005 with improved scores on a
range of indicators including cafes and restaurants, proximity to bus
lines, size of the local cultural sector and crime.
126. Warrandyte -33 $$$
127. Saint Helena +60 $$$
128. Mount Dandenong +2 $$
The number one suburb for tree density in Melbourne, and, naturally, one of the hilliest,
Mount Dandenong sits 152 places higher than its neighbour Kilsyth (280), which has less open space and a less dramatic landscape.
129. Docklands +78 $$$$
Docklands is improving, tram extensions and
better shopping contributing to a 78-place rise in ranking since the
2005 study. The waterfront neighbourhood is also a great reflection of
how liveability is difficult to define, sitting on virtually equal
footing with leafy Eltham (130).
130. Eltham -5 $$$
131. Watsonia -37 $$
132. Port Melbourne -13 $$$$
133. Moorabbin -31 $$$
134. Wattle Glen +9 $$
In the far east, north of Diamond Creek (205),
Wattle Glen
is a low-density suburb that ranks on the bottom for shopping
facilities yet very well for its low levels of road congestion, its open
space, tree cover and proximity to trains.
135. Cheltenham -15 $$$
136. Bellfield +1 $$
137. Box Hill South -14 $$$
138. Lower Plenty +11 $$$
139. Pascoe Vale +25 $$$
140. Bulleen -37 $$$
141. Ringwood North +3 $$
142. Vermont -4 $$
143. Mitcham -16 $$$
144. Edithvale +23 $$
The corridor along the coast between Aspendale (266) and Frankston (193) does not fare well. Except for
Edithvale, which is better on trains, congestion, tree cover and schools, outranking nearby Chelsea Heights (290) by 146 places.
145. Preston -12 $$$
146. Mordialloc-24 $$$
147. Dingley Village +4 $$
148. Springvale South -8 $$
149. Strathmore Heights +46 $$$
150. Blackburn South +21 $$$
151. Beaconsfield +10 $$
152. Olinda -8 $$
153. Maidstone +109 $$
A big part of the inner-west resurgence,
Maidstone
has risen 109 places (more than any other suburb) since 2005. Another
great example of the variable nature of liveability, it is ranked
alongside the tourist village of Olinda (152).
154. Coburg North +55 $$
155. Glen Waverley +58 $$$
156. Nunawading -41 $$$
157. Spotswood +20 $$$
158. Doncaster -34 $$$
159. Yallambie +4 $$
160. Park Orchards -24 $$$$
161. Noble Park +22 $$
162. Greensborough -15 $$
163. Seabrook +68 $$
Improved open space and provision of cafes and restaurants has helped outer south-western
Seabrook
rise 68 places since the 2005 Liveable Melbourne survey, although the
greatest change was an increase in proximity to bus lines. It scores
well on congestion, open space and proximity to coast.
164. Jacana +5 $
With a median house price of $385,000, one of the lowest in the survey,
Jacana, near Broadmeadows, is relatively good value, perched midway in our table above many much pricier suburbs.
165. Blackburn North +13 $$$
166. Burwood East -35 $$$
167. Research +22 $$$
168. Clayton South -34 $$
169. Viewbank -21 $$$
170. Kalorama = $$
171. Belgrave South +17 $$$
172. West Melbourne +36 $$$$
173. Donvale +33 $$$
174. Doncaster East -16 $$$
175. Upper Ferntree Gully +27 $$
176. Reservoir -44 $$
Located just north of Preston (145),
Reservoir
is Melbourne’s most populous suburb, home to more than 45,000
residents. A slight decline in a few indicators caused the suburb to
drop 44 ranking spots since 2005.
177. Rosanna -27 $$$
178. Mentone -4 $$$
In many ways,
Mentone is an ideal bayside
suburb, and it does score highly for shopping, cafes and coastal
proximity, but it is dragged out of the top half of the rankings by low
scores on public transport, open space, and lack of hilliness and
tree cover.
179. Oakleigh East +42 $$$
180. Williamstown North +9 *
181. Niddrie +18 $$$
182. Oakleigh South -30 $$$
183. Belgrave Heights +43 $$
184. Altona +12 $$$
185. Montrose -25 $$
186. Wheelers Hill +52 $$$
One of the highest risers in our list since the last survey, the south-eastern suburb of
Wheelers Hill jumps up 52 places. A major attraction is the vast Jells Park, which has nine kilometres of bike paths.
187. Templestowe -6 $$$$
188. Clarinda -53 $$
189. Avondale Heights -4 $$
190. Heatherton +33 $$$
191. Keysborough +46 $$
192. Ringwood -27 $$
193. Frankston -25 $
194. North Warrandyte +42 $$$
195. Monbulk -15 $$
196. Glenroy -14 $$
197. Dallas +1 $
198. Fawkner +3 $$
199. Eaglemont -37 $$$$$
Dropping 37 places since our last survey in 2005, leafy
Eaglemont,
proud custodian of a group of homes designed around parkland by Walter
Burley Griffin, ranks as the lowest-placed suburb with a median house
price over $1.2 million — two spots below Dallas, where the median
house price is just $320,000.
200. Plenty +28 $$$$
201. Boronia -61 $$
202. Seaford -49 $$
203. Bentleigh East +51 $$$
204. The Basin +14 $$
205. Diamond Creek +18 $$
206. Dandenong -34 $$
207. Watsonia North +3 $$
208. Sunshine -8 $$
209. Vermont South -33 $$$
210. The Patch +25 $$
211. Carrum -58 $$
212. Frankston North -39 $
The cheapest suburb in Melbourne is
Frankston North, with a median house price of $288,000 - yet it's a long way from being the least liveable. A bargain.
213. Gladstone Park +21 $$
214. Mount Evelyn -10 $$
215. Sherbrooke -58 *
216. Heidelberg West -30 $$
217. Laverton +30 $
218. Albion -5 $$
219. Broadmeadows -28 $
220. Ferntree Gully +7 $$
221. Mooroolbark -38 $$
222. Forest Hill -25 $$
223. Meadow Heights -19 $
224. Truganina -14 $
225. Lalor -1 $
226. Croydon -33 $$
227. Keilor East -15 $$$
228. Airport West -26 $$
A small suburb south of Tullamarine (289) and north of Niddrie (181),
Airport West has the lowest ranking for cultural sector but has excellent shopping facilities and low congestion on its arterial roads.
229. Bonbeach -13 $$
230. Mill Park -8 $$
231. Frankston South -1 $$
232. Wonga Park +18 $$$
233. Sunshine West +39 $$
234. Westmeadows -40 $$
235. Bundoora -16 $$
236. Altona Meadows -21 $$
237. Wantirna +2 $$
238. Heidelberg Heights +3 $$
239. Strathmore +5 $$$
240. Eumemmerring +6 *
241. Doveton +1 $
242. Lilydale +6 $$
243. Notting Hill -104 $$
The greatest decline in ranking since 2005,
Notting Hill
plummeted 104 places, mostly after a drop in score on schools due to
the closure of Monash Primary School, Monash Secondary School and
Westerfield Preschool between 2006 and 2009.
244. Ardeer -79 $
Between Sunshine West (233) and St Albans (282) — both geographically and in our rankings —
Ardeer
scores well on open space, thanks to parkland around Kororoit Creek,
but has dropped 79 places since 2005 on the back of an increase in
crime.
245. Point Cook -13 $$
246. Lysterfield South +7 *
The top suburb for open space, more than 50 per cent of
Lysterfield South
is made up of Lysterfield Park, with a swimmable lake and extensive
trails; it was the venue for mountain biking events at the 2006
Commonwealth Games.
247. Harkaway +2 $$
248. Altona North +8 $$
249. Wantirna South -24 $$
250. Springvale -5 $$
251. Coolaroo -31 $
252. Croydon Hills +15 $$
253. Hadfield +16 $$
254. Croydon North -4 $$
255. Croydon South +2 $$
256. Roxburgh Park -16 $
257. Gowanbrae +38 $$
Up 38 places (from 295 in 2005),
Gowanbrea,
between Glenroy (196) and Gladstone Park (213), climbs the list thanks
to its greatly improved proximity to bus services, including the opening
of bus route 490 in 2008.
258. Kealba = $
259. Langwarrin -16 $$
260. Albanvale -1 $
261. Wandin North +12 $$
262. Patterson Lakes -1 $$
Just up the road from Frankston (193),
Patterson Lakes
is a short walk from the coast with loads of open space and uncluttered
roads but it lacks tree cover, proximity to schools and scores low on
all forms of public transport.
263. Cranbourne = $
264. Taylors Lakes +12 $$
A gain of 12 places since 2005 (when it ranked 276) in
Taylors Lakes can be put down to a higher rating on shopping facilities following the expansion of Watergardens Town Centre in 2007.
265. Warranwood +10 $$$
266. Aspendale +4 $$$
267. Hoppers Crossing -7 $
268. Mulgrave +12 $$
269. Brooklyn +12 $$
270. Chelsea +12 $$
271. Kings Park +16 $
272. Clayton -55 $$$
273. Keilor Downs +4 $$
274. Berwick +12 $$
275. Baxter -42 $
276. Werribee -5 $
277. Dandenong North -9 $$
278. Bayswater -12 $$
279. Endeavour Hills = $$
280. Kilsyth -25 $$
281. Delahey +23 $
282. St Albans -19 $$
283. Greenvale -9 $$
A developing suburb on the edge of Roxburgh Park (256) and Meadow Heights (223),
Greenvale is the worst-ranked suburb for cafes and restaurants, although developments are planned.
284. Carrum Downs -19 $
285. Narre Warren South +5 $$
286. Aspendale Gardens +23 $$
287. Narre Warren -4 $
288. Hampton Park +1 $
289. Tullamarine -4 $$
290. Chelsea Heights +4 $$
291. Epping +1 $
292. Lysterfield +11 $$$
293. Thomastown -5 $$
294. Scoresby -10 $$
295. Knoxfield -4 $$
296. Junction Village +16 $
297. Keilor +2 $$
298. Attwood -46 $$$
299. Cranbourne North +8 $
300. Chirnside Park -22 $$
At just over 32 hectares, outer-northeast
Chirnside Park
is by far our largest suburb. An area of small farms and some houses,
it is ranked worst for proximity to schools in part because of its sheer
size.
301. Rowville -8 $$
302. Keilor Park -2 $$
303. Narre Warren North -3 $$$$
304. Deer Park -8 $
305. Dandenong South +3 *
306. Craigieburn -9 $
307. Sydenham -1 $$
308. Kilsyth South +2 $$
309. Wandin -7 *
Just past Mount Evelyn (214),
Wandin is the
worst suburb in Melbourne for proximity to public transport, although
that proximity is measured by distance, not travel time: on Wandin’s
uncongested roads, the drive to Lilydale Station typically takes less
than 10 minutes.
310. Campbellfield -5 $
311. Keilor Lodge +3 *
312. Sunshine North -14 $$
313. Bayswater North -2 $$
314. Hallam -1 $
Somebody has to be on the bottom of the list, and it's
Hallam,
which is relatively hilly, has good proximity to trains plus moderate
open space, but which falls down most notably on culture, schools,
shopping and tree cover.